 |
 |
| You are here: Home
> COLUMNS
|
| |
| THAT'S IT |
| The crossover
to digicams |
| The digital image
revolution hasn't anywhere near finished happening
yet... |
|
|
| Mala Bhargava
|
|
 |
Mala Bhargava
is with Cyber Media and edits
Living Digital. You can email
her at malab@cmil.com
|
|
|
The digital image revolution
hasn't anywhere near finished happening yet. Not
by a long shot. That images went digital was in
itself enough of a revolution - and then they had
to go mobile and shareable too. But there are four
fronts on which the digital image has seen very
rapid evolution.
First, the consumer mobile phone. Millions have
now experienced digital photography, thanks to the
camera-phone. Rather than eat into digital camera
sales, they actually helped increase the size of
the pie by getting people to try digital pictures.
And many of these people have figured out that they
need digital cameras too if they want better pictures....
Second, the pros have finally and fully accepted
digital cameras. Major pro brands like Nikon and
Canon going digital with SLRs (single lens reflex
cameras) has made all the difference. No pro would
touch a non-SLR camera. Now, they can use their
family of lenses. They're finally giving in to necessity:
they have to shoot digital, or lose out to
competition. Digital makes hours, even days, of
difference in the race from event to press. So,
that's another slice for the digital pictures pie.
The third front is well matured in India: the photo
shop. Major players like Kodak and Canon, even HP,
have targeted these with digital packages. A passport
photo today is more likely to be digital than Polaroid
in most cities.
 |
| The
HP R707's panoramic mode makes
it possible to take a series of
pan shots and stitch them together
digitally |
|
|
And there's the biggest slice
- the 'compact cameras' bought by the masses. They
span a range from Rs 3,000 to Rs 30,000 and up,
from 2 to 8 megapixels. Not that megapixels alone
mean quality. Yet, compact digicams are getting
pretty serious. They're shipping with some great
optics, electronics, power management and some incredible
software inside. Take HP Photosmart R707. This compact
and solid package bundles a good Pentax 3x optical
zoom lens and 5.1 megapixels sensor with great design
and ease of use. Most impressive is the software
that brings pro expertise to your pictures. 'Real
Life' technologies, HP calls them, let you do things
like removing red-eye after the shot, and bringing
details out of the background and faces out of shadow
with 'adaptive lighting'. There's also its panoramic
mode, which takes a series of pan shots and stitches
them together digitally. (In a test, we got a print-quality
40MB image, though you can go for lower sizes.)
There're a whole lot of user-friendly features.
It's pricey, though - close to Rs 29,000. I'll wait
till it gets to half of that...
The other camera is Nikon's D70, a digital SLR.
A fairly affordable one, compared with earlier digital
SLRs: under Rs 60,000 abroad, including the zoom
lens. There are three things you immediately notice
about this camera. First, it looks, feels and works
like any other Nikon SLR, though it's a bit lighter,
especially with the specially designed lens. (It
also takes standard Nikon AF and manual lenses.)
Second, the speed. Switch it on and shoot instantly;
no waiting at start up or between shots, unlike
regular digital cameras. Which is what you'd expect
of a pro SLR. You can shoot up to 144 pictures at
3 frames per second. Third, the image quality. This
camera uses a 6.1-effective megapixels CCD sensor
that beats Nikon's own 8 megapixels 'Coolpix' non-SLR
model in image quality. It has vivid and accurate
colour and colour-balance, reduced image noise and
amazing tones. Pros consider the D70 among the finest
digital cameras, even though it's among the less
expensive ones.
There's still some way to go before digital displaces
film. Cost has to be addressed: digital remains
more expensive, though effective running cost is
lower. And quality: pros need even better resolution
and bit-depth. And India needs much better PC penetration
for a higher interest in digital photography. But
the camera-phone is helping, as is cheaper printing.
With all these, we could see an inflexion point
in a couple of years when, barring a few specialised
applications, vendors simply switch over completely
to digital. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|